Update: You might be better off using TSDX
"TSDX is a zero-config CLI that helps you develop, test, and publish modern TypeScript packages with ease"
There are so many options for bundling javascript code for NPM packages. This is the most frustrating part of web development for me at the moment because it involves figuring out what combination of tools and configuration options for those tools you need.
The least amount of tools and configuration you can get away with the better. You can always make it more complex later on as your needs change and you need to support more use cases.
A build process I have landed on is gulp + rollup. We are going to look at the build process for a package called get-active-classes. Lets start with the gulp file that builds the bundles.
// gulpfile.js
const gulp = require("gulp")
const rollup = require("rollup")
const rollupTypescript = require("rollup-plugin-typescript2")
gulp.task("default", () => {
return rollup
.rollup({
input: "./src/get-active-classes.ts",
plugins: [
// Options specificed for typescript type declaration files
rollupTypescript({ declarationDir: process.cwd(), declaration: true }),
],
})
.then(bundle => {
// Build each type of module you want
// EsModule
writeFile(bundle, "es")
// CommonJS
writeFile(bundle, "cjs")
})
})
function writeFile(bundle, format) {
return bundle.write({
file: `./get-active-classes.${format}.js`,
format,
name: "get-active-classes",
sourcemap: true,
})
}
It builds two versions of the source file, one using CommonJS and the other using ES Modules. Along with a get-active-classes.d.ts file for typescript type declarations.
We are writing the compiled files to the root directory because that is where the package.json lives. NPM packages use the package.json directory as the root directory. So if we had multiple files (e.g
import getActiveClasseshelper from "get-active-classes/helper"
In the example of get-active-classes there is only one file so this is not a concern yet.
.gitignore and .npmignore
A gotcha (that got me) is that NPM packages use .gitignore files to determine what files it should ignore.
In my case, I had get-active-classes.cjs.js (etc) in the .gitignore file, so when I published the npm package the compiled files were missing...
To solve this I added a .npmignore file. If that is present then NPM does not use the .gitignore file.
// .npmignore
node_modules
.github
Package.json config
To bring everything together we need some scripts in our package.json and to point the "main", "module" and "types" properties to our files.
- main — path to CommonJS build
- module — path to variant with ES module
- types — path to type declaration file/s
Along with some scripts to make building and deploying process standardized.
{
"name": "get-active-classes",
"version": "0.0.11",
"main": "get-active-classes.cjs.js",
"module": "get-active-classes.es.js",
"types": "get-active-classes.d.ts",
"license": "MIT",
"scripts": {
"test": "jest",
"build": "gulp",
"deploy": "yarn build && yarn publish"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@babel/core": "^7.7.2",
"@babel/preset-env": "^7.7.1",
"@babel/preset-typescript": "^7.7.2",
"@types/jest": "^24.0.23",
"babel-jest": "^24.9.0",
"gulp": "^4.0.2",
"jest": "^24.9.0",
"rollup": "^1.27.0",
"rollup-plugin-typescript2": "^0.25.2",
"tslib": "^1.10.0",
"typescript": "^3.7.2"
}
}
I used jest for unit tests you can copy my config for get-active-classes if you want to use the same set up.
Typescript compiler
Another option I had played around with for bundling this small library was to just use the typescript compiler on its own. It seemed to be a great option apart from not being able to specify the bundle names to add .cjs or .es to the file names.
I could have renamed the files after the bundles were generated but that seemed messier than just using rollup. The typescript compiler approach would of lead to fewer dependencies though.